-- The United States has been working in good faith in the IWC
in recent years to develop reliable scientific data and a
revised management scheme which could serve as a basis for a
decision on whether to lift the moratorium on commercial
whaling.
-- Since that process is nearing completion and scientific
analysis now shows that some populations of minke whales are
likely to be able to sustain a limited harvest , it was time
to review U.S. policy.
-- As evidenced by the unanimous vote in the House for a
resolution to ban commercial whaling, there is presently no
support in the U.S. Congress or among the American public for
commercial whaling.
-- Therefore, the United States has decided not to support
resumption of commercial whaling, whether pelagic or costal,
and will abstain or vote against commercial quotas in the IWC.
-- We will continue to work within the IWC, however, to
perfect the revised management scheme, and will recognize any
decisions taken by the appropriate majority of commissioners.
-- In making this decision, the United States is not
challenging the IWC's scientific assessments upon which a
resumption of commercial whaling might be based.
-- We urge all whaling countries to remain in the IWC as the
appropriate international forum to discuss all matters
relating to the exploitation of whales.
-- If a country chooses to ignore the IWC conservation program
and resumes commercial whaling without requisite IWC approval,
that country's actions will be reviewed for certification
under U.S. law and sanctions will be considered where
appropriate.
-- The United States sees a distinct difference between
commercial whaling and aboriginal subsistence whaling as
presently regulated by the IWC. We will continue to support
the latter where there is a demonstrated cultural and
subsistence need.
-- We trust that even though it has left the IWC, Iceland will
continue to abstain from commercial whaling.
-- We urge you, to approach this issue in the context of
broader political and economic interests and to weigh the
risks against the costs. It is a calculation only Iceland can
make, but it is a calculation that must be made.
-- The key thing is to avoid precipitous actions that could
isolate Iceland, trigger sanctions, undermine Iceland's
international image, and set in train developments over which
we both will have little control.